Cricinfo



Cricinfo Registration

home Cricinfo 3D Audio Video Photos Fantasy Slogout Help and Feedback

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v England
Sth Africa v Bangladesh
Pakistan v West Indies
Australia v New Zealand
Zimbabwe v Sri Lanka
Champions Twenty20
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



Former player extends support to Inzamam

Holding critical of 'first-world hypocrisy'

Cricinfo staff

August 28, 2006



Inzamam's disciplinary hearing is scheduled for the end of September and Michael Holding feels that stating cricket laws as absolute is pointless. Every law has room for flexibility © AFP

Michael Holding, the former West Indies fast bowler, lent his support to Inzamam-ul-Haq, saying that Darrell Hair was "insensitive" to have penalised Pakistan for ball-tampering.

"I have absolute and all sympathy with [Pakistan captain] Inzamam-ul Haq. If you label someone a cheat, please arrive with the evidence," Holding wrote in India Today, a leading weekly news magazine. Holding felt that most umpires would have said something to the fielding captain and given the offending team a warning of some kind. "Then if the tampering continued, they would have been totally justified in taking action.

"There is a double standard at work in cricket and this episode has only highlighted it. When England used reverse-swing to beat the Australians in the 2005 Ashes, everyone said it was great skill. When Pakistan does it, the opposite happens, no one thinks it is great skill. Everyone associates it with skullduggery.

"When bombs go off in Karachi and Colombo everyone wants to go home. When bombs go off in London, no one says anything. That is first-world hypocrisy and we have to live with it."

Holding said that seeing the cricketing law as the absolute and final truth was pointless. Every law, he wrote, has room for flexibility. "I read a prime example recently in the British press. It said that by law, you can be fined for parking within the yellow lines in England. If you do that to run into a chemist to buy emergency medicines, a sensible policeman would more than likely tell you about the law but it's unlikely a ticket would be forthcoming."

The executive board of the ICC is scheduled to meet on September 2 in Dubai to discuss the ball-tampering issue further. Inzamam's disciplinary hearing for Pakistan's actions of ball-tampering and bringing the game into disrepute in the fourth Test against England at The Oval will take place around the end of September.

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England special edition just launched
Test your knowledge
    Fantasy cricket: India v England, Australia v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



In Focus

Stories

Players/Umpires

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Video: our daily SportsCenter round-up
Watch on cricinfo.tv
Fantasy: Ind v Eng, Aus v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England edition
Take the challenge now
 
Sponsored Links
09 Cricinfo Guide to International Cricket
Order now at Cricshop
Bet now on the India v England ODI series
Fixed odds at bet365
The best online rugby coverage - Scrum.com
Site just re-launched
Follow the 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories